|
I wanted to write to you
all and correct some misconceptions and fears related to the Program
Assessment Exam (PAE) that was developed by the Program Assessment
Exam Committee (PAEC) at the request of the ARC-ST.
Remember that under
outcomes-based accreditation, an exam that specifically assesses the
quality of a curriculum according to the Core Curriculum for Surgical
Technology was needed. The PAE meets the necessary criteria for proper assessment
of a surgical technology curriculum.
Keep in mind that the
exam is a tool for program improvement, not a punitive instrument that
is used against you. It is your tool, and we expect it to be used to
improve deficiencies in your curriculum. The exam is broken into the
primary areas of the 4th ed of the Core Curriculum (CC), so that you
can assess what portion of your curriculum is deficient according to
the CC. As you incorporate the 5th ed of the Core Curriculum (after
about a year) we will begin to add questions from the new CC.
The exam is yet to
undergo a validation process, but we can begin that soon. Questions
that are frequently and consistently missed are deemed invalid, and
replaced. The first round of examinations was meant to identify the
questions that are valid, and to receive input from you all for
improvement. Currently, the exam is task-based, mostly related to
memory items. We will eventually change that to a performance-based
exam that requires critical-thinking skills and utilizes scenarios and
case studies with illustrations.
Outcomes-based
accreditation is designed to give you and us a valid and realistic
snapshot of the quality of your students, and therefore the quality of
your program. For the first time in our history, we actually have a
method for standardizing and improving our educational process, and
the PAE helps make that possible. The Standards and Guidelines for
Surgical Technology now state that each program must incorporate the
new Core Curriculum for Surgical Technology in order to maintain their
accreditation status, another large step in the standardization
process.
After the PAE is where
we all want it (and that may take a year or so) and we have
incorporated your input and validated the exam, and it reflects the
new Core Curriculum rather than the old, then we can properly use it
as a core indicator for outcomes. The scores will not be given full
weight until that occurs. Until then, take the reports generated from
your graduates' scores and use them to improve the deficient areas.
And in the meantime, work with the committee to make the best program
assessment tool possible.
We appreciate your
patience and we welcome your input as we boldly incorporate these
changes and work out the kinks. Change is hard, but surgical
technology educators are resilient because they have, in my opinion,
the most difficult jobs in the country.
See you all soon,
Paul
Price,
CST, MBA
Executive
Director
ARC-ST, AC-PE
Education/Accreditation
Director
AST
|